Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Selby Abbey Parish Registers
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Shelagh | Report | 27 Mar 2007 22:55 |
I've recently been trawling through the Selby Abbey baptism registers. I have found entries for my ancestors (all siblings) recorded from1826 to 1839 and then same names with the same parents (same occupaton for the father) appear again in 1848 (all on the same date. When I asked staff at the archives if they could have somehow been baptised twice I was told that that wasn't possible, and there could be no mistakes in the registers. However, I've crossed referenced with the census details and cannot find a second family with the same names. Has anyone else come across this either in Selby or other parish registers? Is there a logical explanation? Shelagh |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 27 Mar 2007 23:46 |
Yes, I've come across the same phenomenon although not as extreme as yours: as with your people there was a mass baptism and one child that had been christened some years earlier was done a second time. I suppose they forgot. Peter |
|||
|
Shelagh | Report | 28 Mar 2007 15:15 |
Thanks, Peter. It doens't say a lot for my ancestors' memories. You would have thought they would have at least remembered having one child baptised. Unless they thought a double dose gave them more of a chance in this life and the next. Perhaps a curate was over zealous. Shelagh. |