Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
c1876 English birth question
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mhairi Queen of Scots | Report | 22 Jan 2007 14:51 |
|
see below |
|||
|
Kate | Report | 22 Jan 2007 14:56 |
|
Mhairi, if they both went to register the birth together and admitted that they were not married, then it should be indexed under both surnames. If they pretended they were married then it would only be under the father's surname. If only the mother went to register the birth, and she admitted she was not married, it should be under her surname. Basically, you should try looking under both. |
|||
|
Mhairi Queen of Scots | Report | 22 Jan 2007 14:56 |
|
My grt grandparents never married though they lived together and had at least nine children. Both the father and mother signed on all birth certs. One of the kids was born in England, said to be Newcastle. Would the birth be registered under the fathers name (Cunningham) or the mothers maiden name (Hutton)? Thanks Mhairi |
|||
|
Mhairi Queen of Scots | Report | 22 Jan 2007 15:11 |
|
Thanks Kate Mhairi |
|||