Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Where are the Tunn's
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Helen | Report | 21 Nov 2006 19:21 |
|
1841 Kirkwhelpington, Bellingham Joseph Mole 55 Jane 50 William 14 James 13 Jane 10 Ann 8 Margaret 6 Elizabeth 4 |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 21 Nov 2006 19:31 |
|
I was half hoping that William Mole confessed to his children after his wife's death that he was really called Tunn. It seems to be around this time that their names changed. But all the records seem to show he really was a Mole....... Why the name change???????? AAARRRGGGHHHHHH!!!! |
|||
|
Helen | Report | 21 Nov 2006 19:45 |
|
Possibly found Jane as a 'visitor' with some Mole relatives in 1881, probably her Uncle? Joseph Mole head 63 farmer Jane Mole wife 53 John Mole son 30 Mary Mole dau 28 William Mole son 25 Joseph Mole son 23 George L Mole servant 21 Jane Mole visitor 13 RG11; Piece: 5112; Folio: 111; Page: 1 |
|||
|
OneStopGenealogy | Report | 22 Nov 2006 11:30 |
|
Just to thank you all for trying to find this family. If the Tunn family did change their name to Mole, I guess we'll never know why. If the certificates ive odered throw up anything else , i'll let you know. Karrie |
|||