Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Desperate please help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Jim The Ferret | Report | 11 Oct 2006 22:26 |
|
Guess this is a possible birth Births Jun 1877 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CLARKE George Frederick Middlesbro' 9d 641 in 1901 he seems to be in Birkenhead - occupation Carter - so could be doing a delivery - though he is shown as a boarder 1901 England Census Record about George Clarke Name: George Clarke Age: 25 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1876 Relation: Boarder Gender: Male Where born: Middlesborough, Yorkshire, England Civil Parish: Birkenhead Ecclesiastical parish: St John County/Island: Cheshire Country: England Street address: Occupation: Condition as to marriage: Education: Employment status: View Image Registration district: Birkenhead Sub-registration district: Birkenhead ED, institution, or vessel: 26 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 245 Household Members: Name Age Gertrude Addison 32 Gertrude Addison 4 months John Addison 37 George Briggs 38 George Briggs 8 Jane Briggs 28 George Clarke 25 Source Citation: Class: RG13; Piece: 3391; Folio: 157; Page: 43. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 11 Oct 2006 22:03 |
|
Yes that is the correct 1901 census, thank you for taking the time to help. |
|||
|
Jim The Ferret | Report | 11 Oct 2006 21:53 |
|
I guess it's this one 1901 England Census Record about William Clark Name: William Clark Age: 64 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1837 Relation: Boarder Gender: Male Where born: Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, England Civil Parish: Middlesbrough Ecclesiastical parish: St John Town: middlesbrough County/Island: Yorkshire Country: England Registration district: Middlesbrough Sub-registration district: Middlesbrough ED, institution, or vessel: 15 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 219 Household Members: Name Age John Clark 11 William Clark 64 Alice Hammond 14 John Hammond 49 John Hammond 12 Daisy Lambert 14 Mary Lambert 65 William Lambert 70 James Trainer 67 Source Citation: Class: RG13; Piece: 4575; Folio: 179; Page: 39. Jim |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jane | Report | 11 Oct 2006 21:35 |
|
could you please post the details you have already got from 1901 as a reference for us......... i can't find him in 1901 to confirm 1891 findings , lol thanks Jane update - forget that,........ got him now, lol |
|||
|
Angela | Report | 11 Oct 2006 21:16 |
|
Trying to trace a William Clark/Clarke who appears on the 1901 census as living as a boarder at 55 Charles Street, Middlesbrough as a widower, he was born about 1837 Nottingham, he is recorded as having two sons, one son John Clark/Clarke born approx 1890 in Middlesbrough Yorkshire and at time of census is age 11. The other son in a George Frederick Clark/Clarke aged 23 in 1901, he does not appear on the 1901 but on his marriage certificate in Dec 1901 he has his address as 55 Charles Street. George Frederick Clark/Clarke is my grandmothers father, I do not know where he was born, I ordered a birth certificate for a George Fredereick Clarke but when it arrived it turned out to be incorrect. Please can anyone help me trace this family on the 1891 census. Could this be the correct entry but they had got the ages of the two children mixed up, please help. |
|||