Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

ancestry 1881/ 1891

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Lady Cutie

Lady Cutie Report 13 Aug 2006 21:48

thank you merry, i think i need a drink now after that , i thought my god where did they come from i thought 3x g/mother had been a naughty girl lol hazelx

Merry

Merry Report 13 Aug 2006 21:47

it's a good job the Seagroatts are not your relations, as you wouldn't have found them!! Merry

Merry

Merry Report 13 Aug 2006 21:43

When you look at the original page for the 1891 census Pope family......if you turn the page to the next census page you will see the next family begins with Annie Seagroatt who is down as Wife rather than Head of her household. I think the transcriber must have had a few, as he/she has transcribed this family with the name Pope as well and didn't make then a separate household either!! Harriet Watson and Alice Woodman are part of the Seagroatt household too! Merry

Lady Cutie

Lady Cutie Report 13 Aug 2006 21:41

merry , i've just gone back to 1891 census and put in james pope 1826 middlesex hornsey head and it came up with annie as his wife charles 6 edgar 9 edmond 12 harry 1 herbert 7 teresa 3/12 harriet watson 21 alice woodman 21 these people are not part of my family hazel

Merry

Merry Report 13 Aug 2006 21:39

Oh, got you now......in 1891 you mean this: Household Members: Name Age Annie Pope 34 Arthur Pope 18 Charles Pope 6 Edgar Pope 9 Edmund Pope 12 Emily J Pope 37 Frank Pope 24 George Pope 1 Harry Pope 5 Herbert Pope 7 James Pope 65 Letitia Pope 59 Teresa Pope 3/12 Harriett Watson 21 Alice Woodman 21 Merry

Merry

Merry Report 13 Aug 2006 21:38

I just see James Letitia Emily Frank Arthur on both censuses and Ernest on the 1881, who I imagine has left home by 1891. merry

Merry

Merry Report 13 Aug 2006 21:32

Before who changed it? What extra 10 people? where are you looking to see them and who are they? I can only see the two households with the people you mention! Merry

Lady Cutie

Lady Cutie Report 13 Aug 2006 21:30

mandy,i have the census of 1891 before they changed it all and the 10 people we'rent on there then hazel

Mandy

Mandy Report 13 Aug 2006 21:27

Maybe the missing family members had left home or were visiting when the census was taken?

Lady Cutie

Lady Cutie Report 13 Aug 2006 21:25

thank you merry 1881 i have james pope age 55 northmer hertfordshire parish hornsey middlesex letitia pope b/ 1832 wife beech hill ,berkshire emily j pope 1854 ernest pope 1858 fank pope 1867 arthur 1873. in the 1891 census james pope 1826 hatfield hertfordshire hornsey letitia pope 1832 buck hill berkshire hornsey emily j pope 1854 daug frank pope 1867 son sorry to be so long winded but cant type fast thanks hazel.

Merry

Merry Report 13 Aug 2006 21:14

I'm not quite sure what you mean? Could you give details of the two households in 1881 and 1891 so we can take a look? Merry

Lady Cutie

Lady Cutie Report 13 Aug 2006 21:06

has anyone else had people added to their families i've just gone on the 1891 census for the pope family hatield and they have added 10 more people to it on the 1881 census they have left out 3 of my family hazel.