Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: June 2003 Posts: 87 Send Message	Janet	Report	14 Jul 2006 15:12
Member Since: June 2003 Posts: 87 Send Message	Birth certificate shows that birth was registered 'by proxy' when the baby was 18 months old. The registration was done by the father and correctly names both parents. Is there likely to be another (earlier) birth certificate? The person thinks they were fostered at birth with a view to adoption but the adoption never happenned. Thanks for any help.
Member Since: September 2004 Posts: 9,872 Send Message	Merry	Report	14 Jul 2006 15:13
	See your other thread....same title! merry

All site material is owned by Findmypast Limited and should not be used without prior permission.

Any views expressed in message boards and members notes represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the opinions of Findmypast Limited.