Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Which one would you back? Sorted! Thanx Roy

Login to Add Reply Watch This
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Jen ~

Jen ~ Report 15 Jun 2006 10:15

Roy, You were perfectly right, just been off to re~check the name, which I had not noticed initially. On LDS the ones under Price don't appear to have a batch number but, the Rice name does....................which backs up Hugh Wallis and the birth certificate. So I am deciding to settle on Rice, as you pointed out, it's obviously safer, as it is likely to be the correct spelling. Thankx a bunch..........or should that be batch! LOL Jen

Porkie_Pie

Porkie_Pie Report 15 Jun 2006 09:04

The records you found on the LDS site are sometimes not very accurate, check and see if the entry has got a batch number or if it was submitted by a member, if it has a batch number then it has been transcribed from the parish records, if it has got a submitter you will need to clarify the info as to how accurate it is. Roy

Jen ~

Jen ~ Report 15 Jun 2006 01:22

Mystery with a family name ~~~~~~~~~~ On Hugh Wallis I have a Mary Rice who married a John Madeley 25/11/1791~~~~~ the Rice name is carried down and given as a middle name to a gg aunt one Margaret Rice Madeley, which is confirmed on her birth cert, in 1858.~~~~~~~~~ However, if I put the Rice name in for the ancestors of Mary going back, nothing is showing on Hugh Wallis.~~~~~~~~~~~ In LDS on IGI, this name is given as Price, even to the old spelling Pryce with a 'Y'~~~~~~~~~Likewise on the census' As I can think of no other way of determining what the name is meant to be~~~~~~~~~~~which do you think is the safest bet?~~~~~~~Jen