Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

approx. ages on GC Tree ?

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Bobtanian

Bobtanian Report 28 Mar 2004 23:30

I dont usually have a problem with guesstimated ages, but what DOES annoy me is missing places of birth....if you are not sure just put uk, or whatever country. I recently contacted a person with a name in my tree....totally useless.....the reply was " born in the states"...why couldnt he have put that in the first place? Bob

BrianW

BrianW Report 28 Mar 2004 22:49

I usually take 20 years off the youngest child, or 25 years if I don't know where the child appears in the list.

Sue in Sx

Sue in Sx Report 28 Mar 2004 19:58

Thanks everyone - I thought about 20yrs should do it, I just wanted to know if there was any protocol involved with this sort of thing. I agree it is annoying to find 0 by someones name it gives no clue at all. Also place of birth - at least take a guess - I usually put the same birthplace as the first child for a parent but if i don't know for sure add square brackets[ ] round it. I think I read somewhre that that was the way to do it. Sue.

Naomi in SW

Naomi in SW Report 28 Mar 2004 19:53

True, I have a family where the eldest daughter is 21 and youngest is 1 month on the 1891 census. The Mum is only 42. Naomi

Geoff

Geoff Report 28 Mar 2004 19:33

I suppose 20-25 might be their age when the first child was born, but usually they were at it for 20 years after that.

Naomi in SW

Naomi in SW Report 28 Mar 2004 18:54

I always put 20-25 years too and tick the circa box. Naomi

Debbie

Debbie Report 28 Mar 2004 18:33

Lisa I shouldnt have wrote what I did, I am so sorry I just came back to delete it, I suppose I was annoyed about something else. Please accept my apology and put what you like in your tree and ignore stupid people like me. Debbie

Debbie

Debbie Report 28 Mar 2004 17:50

Lisa There is nothing more annoying than finding a name but the age is 0, you may as well take a guess otherwise its just so frustrating ive never had to do that. like you I guess about 10 years and put the c what is so hard about that. Debbie

Debbie

Debbie Report 28 Mar 2004 17:29

Hi Sue I think when you enter the year of birth, just below is a box that you click on and it comes up as a tick. And then when the year is actualy shown in your tree it will say c1820 which I think means Circa. Debbie

Sue in Sx

Sue in Sx Report 28 Mar 2004 17:10

When adding to Tree you have to put an apprximate age.. So if I have a child born in say 1820 and I only know his fathers name - what year would I put for an approx. dob for his father ? Sue

Sue in Sx

Sue in Sx Report 28 Mar 2004 17:08

What do you put ??