General Chat

I believe that one of the "Red Tops" obtained the necessary to have a DNA test on Harry, and it proved beyond any doubt that he is the son of Charles. He looks just like Diana's side of the family. Where these storied start is unfathomable. I have a friend who is convinced that the Duke of Edinburgh had Diana killed. Much as I don't like, (to put it mildly) either of my former daughters in law, I certainly wouldn't want to see the mothers of my grandchildren dead. Bob

Evening peeps, well this thread certainly got the tongues wagging didn't it?

It's quite amazing what turns up in papers all over the world and goodness knows why such ridiculous stories are printed.

Yes PH u r right James Hewitt not the Gilbey fellow. But you have to admit the likeness to him is very striking.

I wonder what the royals make of all the gossip in the papers and do they ever talk about it amongst themselves, probably they do just as we would ;-)

This was a light hearted thread, so hope noone took it too seriously :-D

Florence
in the hebrides :-)

ha i did as well seriously was taken in
i was beveling in every think i was reading
gullible me


i was that taken in i phone son at work and ask
him what is he printing in the papers
is the head lines all about the royal family

he now think im daffa dilly as well

:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D

But he doesn't look like James Hewitt. Eyes and mouth totally different.

http://www.nndb.com/people/540/000044408/

'Changelings' - It is typically described as being the offspring of a fairy, troll, elf or other legendary creature that has been secretly left in the place of a human child. Sometimes the term is also used to refer to the child who was taken.

The apparent changeling could also be a stock or fetch, an enchanted piece of wood that would soon appear to grow sick and die. The theme of the swapped child is common among medieval literature and reflects concern over infants thought to be afflicted with unexplained diseases, disorders, or developmental disabilities.

A human child might be taken due to many factors: to act as a servant, the love of a human child, or malice. Most often it was thought that fairies exchanged the children. Some Norwegian tales tell that the change was made to prevent inbreeding: to give trolls and humans new blood, humans were given children with enormous strength as a reward.

In some rare cases, the very elderly of the Fairy people would be exchanged in the place of a human baby, and then the old fairy could live in comfort, being coddled by its human parents.

Simple charms, such as an inverted coat or open iron scissors left where the child sleeps, were thought to ward them off; other measures included a constant watch over the child.

(C&P from the Net).