Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Passenger list search please
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
MargaretM | Report | 28 Mar 2008 17:16 |
Happy holidays! Cynthia. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 28 Mar 2008 17:11 |
Yeeeess, so since Reginald was with his mother in 1911, then either this is a different child (I don't have access to Scottish birth records, just England and Wales), or may just possibly be the right Reginald, coincidentally travelling with some home children? |
|||
|
Cynthia | Report | 28 Mar 2008 17:01 |
What wonderful people you are but I'm now totally confused! I am so grateful for the time taken over this. I will print if off and study it in detail. I think Agnes must be a coincidence, but whatever did my great aunt Delma do with her 1st husband? I have a photo of her when she is elderly and she looks a real tartar! Reginald is definitely on the 1911 Canadian Census with his mother and her new husband and I have his military attestation record but why he travelled to Canada as he did remains a mystery. I guess poor little Winifred must have died. Hope I'm making sense here! Am off on holiday for a week tomorrow - I think I need it just to sort this lot out! Many, many thanks all. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 28 Mar 2008 16:52 |
I must say, though, I have never heard of a home child coming to Canada to join a parent. They were always orphans who were adopted into families here. Some were very lucky and became a member of the family, others were treated as unpaid servants and had a very rough time. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 28 Mar 2008 16:30 |
The UK records have Matthew and James on the same ship, same year, but leaving Liverpool on 21 May 1908 - which would be a 70 day turnaround for the ship, which sounds feasible. |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 28 Mar 2008 16:18 |
So possibly George (Alfred?) Clark had died before 1906, the family were taken into care (still the workhouse at that date?), and the authorities paid for their passages as they became old enough to work (or once his mother had saved enough to pay for him to join her?) |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 28 Mar 2008 16:07 |
Oh my goodness! According to this Reginald was a home child, an orphan sent to Canada. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 28 Mar 2008 15:34 |
Ahh, I see, the ships would visit several ports in the destination country. Winifred and Delina's ship was bound for Montreal, but they had contracted to disembark at Quebec. What were Agnes and Reginald's disembarkation ports? |
|||
|
JackieinEssex | Report | 28 Mar 2008 15:25 |
A second look gives different destinations for Reginald and Agnes, looks like he travelled alone. He is entered as a 2nd class passenger. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 28 Mar 2008 15:17 |
Has anyone access to North American arrivals? |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 28 Mar 2008 15:05 |
Umm, I'm wondering about that 1908 sailing now. Page 1 has lots of boys on a couple of tickets, all farm-hands, aged abt 13 upwards, mainly English. Reginald is a single traveller on the ref between these, down in the "Scotch" columns, occupation child. |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 28 Mar 2008 15:00 |
Hi Jackie, apologies, I had thought it was the same page - but I didn't check the image. Oops - quite right - I jumped to the "also travelled" bit without checking the page number (although I did for Delina and Winifred since they were several Clarks on that voyage) |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 28 Mar 2008 14:56 |
Sorry, no, Geo/George/George A/GA Clark sailing does not jump out at me. I'd hate to have taken my 9 yr old with me and left the 7 yr old behind for a couple of years. I suppose it might point to a separation, with Reginald staying behind with the Clarks? |
|||
|
JackieinEssex | Report | 28 Mar 2008 14:56 |
Looking at the passenger lists 1 is on page 1 , the other page 5 so they may not have been travelling together. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JackieinEssex | Report | 28 Mar 2008 14:54 |
Found this record for Reginald looks as above: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 28 Mar 2008 14:50 |
Great, Ivy! Keep it up. Wonder why Adelaide/Delina would bring Winnifred with her and leave Reginald behind? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 28 Mar 2008 14:40 |
Aha, on a roll (I rarely find any passenger sailings!): |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 28 Mar 2008 14:27 |
Wow, a breakthrough! Who's Agnes, then, Cynthia? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 28 Mar 2008 14:25 |
I think I may have Reginald's sailing. |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 28 Mar 2008 14:21 |
I found her second husband on the 1901 Canadian census. He was married at the time with a young daughter. I found the death of his daughter but not his wife. Get's more complicated, doesn't it? Now you have both partners of the marriage that you can't find the death of their previous spouse! |
|||
Researching: |