Find Ancestors

havent found her in 1881 only 1871 :o)
thanks

ok is that a death sorry? thank you

Nudged to go with the other thread.

Christine

thanks christine hannah doesnt appear on the 1881 did she die do you think

These are the full details for the 1871.
As he didn't marry Mary till Mar qtr 1871 and there is a daughter Hannah age 5 I wonder if he had been married before.

1871 England Census
about Urier Perkiss
Name: Urier Perkiss
Age: 27
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1844
Relation: Head
Spouse's Name: Mary
Gender: Male
Where born: Walworth, Surrey, England
Civil Parish: Mile End Old Town
Ecclesiastical parish: St Phillip
Town: Mile End Old Town
County/Island: London
Country: England
Street address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage:

Disability: View Image
Registration district: Mile End Old Town
Sub-registration district: Mile End Old Town, Western
ED, institution, or vessel: 8
Household schedule number: 148
Household Members: Name Age
Hannah Perkiss 5 dau born Bethnal Green
Mary Perkiss 21
Urier Perkiss 27

Source Citation: Class: RG10; Piece: 555; Folio: 42; Page: 25;

Christine

could you check census for uriah and purkiss spelt Perkiss incase miss transcribed for earlier census's am gathering newington area

ok perhaps my right uriah is the newington one then as i had in my notes he was born surrey and i dont think thats too far away

thats the only 2 that would fit in, any idea where glandford is i did look at the images but i couldnt make out if its right spelling or not

there is also an uriah porkiss born glandford B wherever this is in June 1847 ref 14 378

find a uriah perkis born newington though would this then not tie in with the census 1861? birth is in mar 1943 ref 4 379

looking for the birth have looked under purkiss 1840 to 1855 nothing. have also looked under just perkiss and nothing

ok thanks tania, so its quite likely this is him then? ive been trying to find a birth for him no luck yet

ok i mean i dont have uriahs birth info so perhaps if we find that he may of infact been born in lincolnshire

the death for thomas the 17 does that mean he was 17 :o)

thanks guys xx

These are the details for the death of Thomas

Deaths Dec 1891 (>99%)

PURKISS Thomas 17 Mile End 1c 340

You can search BMD's on the site below, which is free.

http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/

Not everything has been transcribed but most have from 1837-1920.

I thought Uriah would be easy to trace but he isn't. The names could also be easily mistranscribed.

If you get his marriage cert that will give his father's name which may make it easier.

Christine

ok what are the details tania. how would i trace uriah pre the census 1881 then he was born surrey no idea of parents etc thought with the name uriah and surname purkiss maybe easy to trace?
thank you

Sorry, no luck at all for Uriah in any years, have searched just using Christian name and also just surname.

Christine

ok how about 1871?
thank you

Not having any success locating them in 1901

Christine