Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
James Chamberlain born Ipswich c1871
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Robert | Report | 7 Apr 2008 12:08 |
Hi |
|||
|
Woodie | Report | 7 Apr 2008 12:11 |
Hi, |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 7 Apr 2008 12:13 |
Could this be his birth? |
|||
|
RutlandBelle | Report | 7 Apr 2008 12:13 |
Just for reference is this the right James Chamberlain: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 7 Apr 2008 12:38 |
marriage |
|||
|
Robert | Report | 7 Apr 2008 14:13 |
Yes, that's our man, Rutland Belle! |
|||
|
Robert | Report | 7 Apr 2008 14:24 |
Jim, that's very helpful re marriage AND clearing up the name - and vindicating my Uncle! |
|||
|
Robert | Report | 7 Apr 2008 14:36 |
Hi Keith, that's very intersting that your records show only a mother in the household at that time, as I had found a record for a Robert Chamberlain in Ipswich, who was incarcerated as a lunatic aged 24, occupation 'waterman.' (1871 census).Would have been about the right age. It would be extremely sobering to find out my namesake was a bit unstable (explains a lot, really)! |
|||
|
Robert | Report | 7 Apr 2008 16:54 |
Well, I have visited the census' for 1841-61, which shows a Robert Chamberlain resident in Ipswich, but no record of a marriage or mention at all after 1861. There is the aforementioned inmate who was about 24 in 1871 (if he were father to this Robert who was 3 in 1841, that would have made him about 15). |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 7 Apr 2008 18:19 |
1881 |
|||
|
Robert | Report | 7 Apr 2008 18:34 |
That's fascinating, Jim, and obviously the mis-spelling didn't help. This seems to tie up some things, but I wonder where Robert (who I presume from a family source was his name) ended up? Does the lack of info in the 'Condition as to marriage' entry mean she was single or not - I suspect in those days if there was any skulduggery a tactful silence may have been necessary? |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 7 Apr 2008 18:38 |
Robert, the condition of marriage entry is not transcribed, to see that you have to view the image. |
|||
|
Moggie | Report | 7 Apr 2008 18:49 |
Robert |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 7 Apr 2008 18:50 |
Farrie in 1871 is married,laundress |
|||
|
Robert | Report | 7 Apr 2008 18:51 |
Thanks Keith. |
|||
|
Moggie | Report | 7 Apr 2008 19:25 |
Marriages A/M/J qtr 1868 Ipswich |
|||
|
Robert | Report | 7 Apr 2008 19:42 |
Absolutely fantastic - looks like you guys have nailed it! What image(s) show these facts, so I can hopefully download them. |
|||
|
Thelma | Report | 7 Apr 2008 19:46 |
ROBERT CHAMBERLAIN |
|||
|
Robert | Report | 8 Apr 2008 00:21 |
Keith, I phoned my uncle tonight and he did mention that Peter James was in the Hussars (before I told him)! Wish he gave me more info to go on before, but still - we got there in the end. Even got back to c1803 with another James (father of Robert). |
|||
|
Moggie | Report | 8 Apr 2008 09:20 |
James,Mary Ann and Emily all born Wickham Market. |