Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Date? 1871 census
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ | Report | 19 Jan 2010 22:45 |
Can anyone tell me the date the 1871 census was taken. |
|||
|
Freewheel | Report | 19 Jan 2010 22:48 |
All census dates are online - just google........ |
|||
|
♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ | Report | 19 Jan 2010 22:54 |
Thank you freewheel, I hadn't realised that they didn't have to register births until 1875. |
|||
|
Joy | Report | 19 Jan 2010 22:57 |
The census was taken on the following dates: |
|||
|
♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ | Report | 19 Jan 2010 22:59 |
Thankyou Joy |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 19 Jan 2010 22:59 |
I'd have thought this was the most likely to be correct as seems to be soon after her birth: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 19 Jan 2010 23:01 |
If census was April and she was 7 months, I'd say there is a fair chance this is her birth: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ | Report | 19 Jan 2010 23:02 |
Brummiejan |
|||
|
♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ | Report | 19 Jan 2010 23:03 |
Yes, I saw that one, but 1869? she would have been a year old by the time of 1871 census |
|||
|
♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ | Report | 19 Jan 2010 23:13 |
Why this couple lied about ages all the time, I do not know. They married in 1887 and she was 24 - making her born 1863? |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 19 Jan 2010 23:13 |
This might be them Wife has birthplace as Cleobury Mortimer, as in 1871 - she is older than him too |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ | Report | 19 Jan 2010 23:16 |
How did you find that! That is definately them as Matilda is 6 in 1871 |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 19 Jan 2010 23:19 |
Why thank you! Just looked for Richard and hoped for the best. Needs a lot of imagination this one. I have a family who mixed up all the children's birthplaces so an age swop is quite possible, especially as someone else was recording the details. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ | Report | 19 Jan 2010 23:19 |
Sarah I think, was married before as there are two children Walter Jones and Mary Ann Jones in 1871. I have no idea as to her maiden name |
|||
|
♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ | Report | 19 Jan 2010 23:21 |
where are my manners, sorry. |
|||
|
♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ | Report | 19 Jan 2010 23:23 |
Do you think Ellen could have been registered as Helen at birth? I haven't looked for that |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 19 Jan 2010 23:27 |
It's possible the 1871 ages were mixed up maybe? They would have been registered Ludlow: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ | Report | 19 Jan 2010 23:30 |
I am with you now. |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 19 Jan 2010 23:31 |
Well, it's a theory! It fits with given age at death. How about other censuses and marriage? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
♥Deetortrainingnewfys♥ | Report | 19 Jan 2010 23:32 |
She is 46 in 1911 so that ties-in |