Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

JUST AN ADDRESS

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 20 Jan 2010 21:55

see also

www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards.asp?wci=thread&tk=1199520

LadyKira

LadyKira Report 20 Jan 2010 21:57

Well you lost me too. I was also reading that he was 35 at time of marriage.

Julie

Julie Report 20 Jan 2010 21:58

Well done Maureen

I wondered about him being registered as Rivers

but if you look there is a William John Jackson on the 1891 that you found & one of the births i found was a William John Pearce

OK forget have just looked at the image..whoever transcribed thats need glasses

Julie

Julie Report 20 Jan 2010 22:02

With respect Sylvia

Julia in that other thread is only asking for the 1911, the info she gave for the 1901 was off the back of this one, and on this one we still need the 1891

MaureeninNY

MaureeninNY Report 20 Jan 2010 22:06

I don't know,Julie. The William John JACKSON on the 1891 seems firmly entrenched in that family. I think this is likely him:
Births Jun 1890 (>99%)
Jackson William John St. Olave 1d 287

Deaths Dec 1891 (>99%)
Jackson William John 1 St. Olave 1d 181

Maureen

Julie

Julie Report 20 Jan 2010 22:08

Hi Maureen

i just added to my other post....i have seen the image & it's all in a muddle

Julie

Julie Report 20 Jan 2010 22:11

If she was pregnant at the time of the 1891 then there is this 1in the area that they were living in in 1891

Births Mar 1891 (>99%)
Pearce William Henry St. Olave 1d 264

LadyKira

LadyKira Report 20 Jan 2010 22:12

well i already trawled through 1911 for every charles and eliza without being corrected on the birth dates. It is important to give as much info as you knowabout names dates and places.

Julie

Julie Report 20 Jan 2010 22:16

You have to take birth dates with a pinch of salt, don't forget back then they didn't celebrate birthdays like we do
& the 1891 does say he is 35 so it does tie in with the M/C