Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Problem with Marriage record
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Geoff | Report | 24 Apr 2011 21:47 |
I've tried to find the spouse of John Hancox, marriage in Shipston-on-Stour Jan-Mar 1882. Usually clicking on the page number brings up the spouse/choice of spouses. But this time it produces no result, either in FreeBMD or Ancestry. The volume is 6d, page number is 689. Any ideas, anyone? |
|||
|
Joy *The Carlos Cutie of Ilson* | Report | 24 Apr 2011 21:57 |
Wife's first name? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 24 Apr 2011 21:59 |
Try looking at the full list of marriages for the qtr/district. |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:01 |
'Shipston' is in italics.....so obviously a 'suspect' district |
|||
|
alviegal | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:05 |
I wonder if this might be the missing one? Trouble is it does seem to be 669 on the image and John's is 689. Shipston is also in italics. |
|||
|
Geoff | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:07 |
I'm afraid I don't know, maybe Helen? This one's a real headache & needs more investigation. |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:08 |
Checking INFO on freebmd.....always worth doing!.........the expected page range for the district is 671 to 678 |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:09 |
How did you get back to him? |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:09 |
Looks like them 1911: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Geoff | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:10 |
Flick, |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:13 |
No marriage in the qtr/district for a HELEN |
|||
|
chrisa | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:15 |
1891 England Census |
|||
|
Geoff | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:16 |
brummiejan |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:16 |
You're missing the point............read the info about page numbers |
|||
|
chrisa | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:17 |
Marriages Dec 1884 (>99%) |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:19 |
Births Mar 1887 (>99%) |
|||
|
Geoff | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:23 |
Flick, |
|||
|
chrisa | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:26 |
Am I invisible? |
|||
|
alviegal | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:31 |
This is your John in 1881. |
|||
|
Geoff | Report | 24 Apr 2011 22:35 |
Chrisa, Thank you for your information, I wasn't meaning to ignore you if that's what you were thinking. I need to check all these facts as there is more than one John Hancox. |