Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Hannah Ward - 1901 and 1911
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Peter | Report | 5 Oct 2012 21:27 |
Hi there, my relation, Hannah Ward, was born in 1844 in Stockton. Her husband was Robert Ward who had died by 1891, when she has a twenty-two year old plater's helper staying at her house. He is Hugh Russell, and he is described as a 'relative', and he was born in Stockton-on-Tees, County Durham. |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 5 Oct 2012 21:55 |
???? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 5 Oct 2012 22:01 |
Hey Kutchina, no her age is only two years out?! Is that correct?! |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 5 Oct 2012 22:02 |
Same family in 1901, Hannah is 'Ann'; |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 5 Oct 2012 22:07 |
Sorry, i got confused about Hannah's age! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 5 Oct 2012 22:07 |
Deaths Dec 1960 (>99%) |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 5 Oct 2012 22:09 |
|
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 5 Oct 2012 22:13 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 5 Oct 2012 22:19 |
Just to add, Hannah's marriage details were crossed out in census 1911, as she was a widow, but they stated she was married 42 years (presumably 42 yrs ago from 1911), had 11 children of the marriage, of whom only 5 were still living. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 5 Oct 2012 22:23 |
Oh wow - that is very helpful to know about Hannah's marriage and children! But how awful for the poor woman. She also had a brother and sister-in-law committed to asylums and their medical reports are not easy reading. |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 5 Oct 2012 22:26 |
And yes, your assumption is correct - Hannah was married in 1868. |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 5 Oct 2012 22:29 |
Her poor daughter Maria Edwards had 3 children from her 7 year marriage, and had lost two by 1911. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 5 Oct 2012 22:31 |
Deaths Dec 1896 (>99%) |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 5 Oct 2012 22:41 |
I guess it depends on how accurate Mary Jane's age is? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 5 Oct 2012 23:02 |
Thank you for the death - I should probably call it a night. I missed that one but was looking in Stockton district (as the registers are with them currently). |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 5 Oct 2012 23:09 |
You posted Mary Jane as born 1889, which is a little late for a father who died last qtr 1887. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 5 Oct 2012 23:16 |
Ah now I understand. Excuse me! |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 5 Oct 2012 23:42 |
And Rose sadly died from her clothes catching fire. Her mother, Hannah, was out hawking pots, and her sister Mrs Wincup was with her. What sad lives. (The North-Eastern Daily Gazette (Middlesbrough, England), Saturday, November 30, 1896.) |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 6 Oct 2012 14:06 |
Census 1911 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 6 Oct 2012 14:07 |
Census 1901: |
|||
Researching: |