Find Ancestors

If the son, John Charles Gillas was born 1930 ... why are we looking for the parents marriage in 1900, surely this is way too early. Since you know Mum's maiden name, you should check on 1837online for all other possible births before John, see when the oldest child was born, and look around that time scale for a marriage. Elaine :-0 Having just read the thread through, it doesn't sound as if you actually KNOW when/Where John Charles was born. How have you got back to John C Gillas ... and what makes you think he may have been born around 1930. What information have you got that connects him to this couple as parents?

Lisa - if a son was born 1930ish then I think it most unlikely his parents married 1900ish. With best will in world son's mother would have been late 40's and I'd have expected to have seen some birth in the late 20's. Have you got the son's BC so that you are giving us accurate info? We already know there are no Gillas marriages 1895 to 1920 or births after 1872 I think we're on a wild goose chase until you have accurate information from a birth certificate

SNAP Elaine - great minds etc lol

Hi Jools, Just glad I didn't see the thread earlier and start looking ! Elaine :-)

Just what I was thinking Jools & Elaine lol

arghhhhhh SORRY.....my mistake, they werent married in 1900 , this is about when charles henry gillas was born...... he married annie edwards in fulham.................. they had john gillas 1930-1991................. john married audrey brown ( born 1933) (my info source)................ they had susan gillas 1958-1988............... susan married les martin (now my partner).............. they had sarah martin 1986 (my step daughter)............. very very sorry for not explaining properly:-(

We are only human !! but .... 'they had john gillas 1930-1991................. john married audrey brown 1933 (my info source)................' am I reading it wrong !!!! LoL ! Elaine :-)

lol not their wedding date............her birth date !!! lol im writing wrong and u r reading wrong hehehe

john married audrey brown 1933 (my info source)................' I think that is when she was born LOL not when he married her

sigh ....

Tell ya what ...now that we seem to be a little straighter with the info, I'll go have a look for 'possible' mistranscriptions of the Gillas that MAYBE was born by the time of the 1901 census !!! I'll only come back if I find anything promising ! Brought a smile to my face anyway ! Elaine :-) !!

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx thank you xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

thank you.....i didnt have a clue to be honest where it was

Hello ! How about this one for the actual MARRIAGE. March 1930 Harold J Gillas = Edwards Kensington 1a, 326 March 1930 Ada A Edwards = Gillas Kensington 1a, 326 This is the ONLY GILLAS marriage between 1925 - 1931 IT MUST be yours ..sorry, I'm NOT taking NO for an ansa !! LoL Ada's middle name must be Annie Elaine :-))))

This COULD be a mistranscription on the 1901 ... but I'll have a LOOK on the image and get back to you: George Giles 34 Paddington, London, England Head Croydon Surrey Mary M M Giles 32 S Norwood, Surrey, England Wife Croydon Surrey George A Giles 11 Paddington, London, England Son Croydon Surrey Arthur W Giles 10 Croydon, Surrey, England Son Croydon Surrey Elsie F Giles 7 Croydon, Surrey, England Daughter Croydon Surrey Annie E M Giles 4 Croydon, Surrey, England Daughter Croydon Surrey Harold J Giles 2 Croydon, Surrey, England Son Croydon Surrey Christopher Walker 39 Carlisle, Cumberland, England Boarder Croydon Surrey Christopher Walker 39 Carlisle, Cumberland, England Boarder Croydon Surrey Adeline M Walker 23 Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England Boarder Croydon Surrey It DOES look like Giles on the image .... Fingers crossed that the Marriage Cert gives you their ACTUAL age and not 'of age'.. Elaine :-)

THANK YOU VERY MUCH XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX U R A STAR!!!!! YES IM SURE THAT MARRIAGE MUST BE THEIRS

Elaine - if Harold J Gillas married an Edwards in q1/1930, how come there are no Gillas births on familyrelatives after 1872??

Jools Familyrelatives is only transcribed up to 1920. After that its just like 1837online. The lists it gives you are just the first and last names on the pages. Easier to use 1837online after 1920 at the moment Margaret

Margaret - if you look at the bottom of page 1 of this thread, you will see that I posted the result of a search on familyrelatives 1866-1920. This is what I was referring to. I know 1837online is the place to go 1921 forwards. I still ask the question - if the last Gillas birth on family relativres in the period 1866-1920 is 1872, how can someone called Gillas marry in 1930 and go on to have children, it is almost biologically impossible.

Jools, I see where your coming from ... and I agree, would seem highly unlikely ! I've never used this Family Relatives site that your referring to ...is it 100% complete & reliable (if its transcribed) I can only give what I find and its definately on the marriages 1837online ...shall I send you the image from 1837 ? Elaine :-)